Cit v shaw wallace
WebIn CIT v. Shaw Wallace and Co. , their Lordships of the Privy Council had occasion to consider the scope of the word "income" as the said term was used in the Indian I.T. Act … Webreference to the case of CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co [(1932) 6 ITC 178]. (10 marks) (b) MT Overland Transport Sdn Bhd (‘the company’) is a locally incorporated company that operates a passenger bus transport business between Kuala Lumpur and Bangkok. The
Cit v shaw wallace
Did you know?
WebCIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. (2024) 278 Taxman 67 (Karn.) (HC) S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Claim not made in original return-Prior period expenses-Allowable as … Webv. Shaw, Wallace And Company (High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) No. 14-03-1932. George Lowndes, J. [1] This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under Section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act, XI of 1922 The reference arose out of an assessment to income tax upon the respondents for ...
WebIn CIT v. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. the Calcutta High Court followed the decision rendered in the case of CIT v. Peerless Consultancy Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (supra). Against the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v. WebJul 29, 2003 · ALTAMAS KABIR, J. (1) AS the appeal involves a question of law, on consent of the parties the appeal itself was taken up for consideration along with the application …
WebShaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.:— The assessee is a company. The assessment year involved is 1963-64, and the relevant accounting year ended on December 31, 1962. The assessee-company received a net dividend of Rs. 2,29,948 from certain companies in the United Kingdom and Ceylon. WebFeb 28, 2001 · Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. v. Dy. Cit Pramod Kumar, A.M. These cross-appeals are directed against the order, dated 10-12-1995, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-II, Calcutta, in the matter of assessment order under section 143(3) for the assessment year 1978-89. 2.
WebIn Maharajkumar Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. CIT I.T. Act, even though the annuity did not constitute or provide a profit or gain to the assessee. After referring to the aforesaid decision of the Privy Council in the case of Shaw Wallace & Co., their Lordship observed as follows (p. 242) : "The word 'income' is not limited by the words 'profits ...
WebS. Subramanian v.CIT (2004 )186 CTR 286 /136 Taxman 653 (Mad) Satyabir Singh v. CIT (2001) 248 ITR 785 (P&H) ... ACIT (1999) 239 ITR 337 (Bom.) Shaw Wallace & Co Ltd v. CTO (1996) 100 STC 270 (AP) III. Recovery proceedings after assessment . 1. Who can be declared as “ Assessee in default” Recovery proceedings can be taken only in cases ... fighter multiclass ideasWebCommissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. Suhas Chandra Sen, J.:— In this case, we are concerned with the assessment year 1964-65, for which the relevant … fighter multiclass dndWebIn CIT v. P. Ali Kunju, M. A. Nazir Cashew Industries [1987] 166 ITR 611, the Kerala High Court referred to the amendment made in Section 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the … grindhouse cargo pantsWebIn CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the definition of income is as follows: “….income connotes a periodical monetary return coming in with some sort of regularity, … grindhouse cannabisWebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shaw, Wallace And Co. on 14 March, 1932 Wallace Brothers And Co. Ltd. vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 17 February, 1948 Section 6 in The Income- Tax Act, 1995 Citedby 194 docs - [View All] C.W. Spencer vs The Income-Tax Officer on 24 April, 1956 grindhouse cafe griffith indianaWebShaw Wallace considerably shaken. & CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 340 of 1957. Appeal from the judgment and order dated November 29, 1954, of the Hyderabad High Court in Reference No. 234/5 of 195354. K. N. Rajagopala Sastri, B. H. Dhebar and D. Gupta, for the appellant. fighter muhammad aliWebJUDGMENT Altamas Kabir J. 1. As the appeal involves a question of law, on consent of the parties the appeal itself was taken up for consideration along with the application for stay of operation of the judgment and order dated June 11, 2003, passed by the learned single judge on the writ petition filed by the appellant herein, being W. P. No. 992 of 2003 … fighter multiclass 5e